JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 11, 2014

A- de 2014

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Mauricio González Cuervo

✓Claimant Eloy Alberto Parra Ospina

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad Sobre Ejercicio Arbitrario De Custodia De Hijo Menor De Edad
  • Declarar improcedente recusación contra Procurador General de la Nación por falta de legitimidad procesal
Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia para resolver recusaciones contra Procurador General
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto se resuelve una recusación formulada contra el Procurador General de la Nación, dentro del trámite del proceso de constitucionalidad de la referencia.

La Sala Plena concluye que, el memorialista, al no haber intervenido de manera oportuna en el proceso y por tanto, no haber concretado su interés dentro del mismo, carece de legitimidad procesal para recusar al Jefe del Ministerio Publico y por ello, declara IMPROCEDENTE la recusación formulada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional en ejercicio de sus facultades constitucionales y legales,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. DECLARAR improcedente, por falta de legitimidad procesal, la recusacion formulada por el ciudadano Eloy Alberto Parra Ospina contra el Procurador General de la Nacion, en el proceso de constitucionalidad D-9855.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.